Do You Need Legal Help?
Complete and submit this form and we will contact you shortly.
* required fields. |
|
|
A New Hampshire drunk driving arrest is
no joke – a motorist accused of driving under the influence faces
jail, fines, and driver’s license suspensions. The repercussions of a
DUI / DWI arrest are severe, but not unavoidable if the driver has
expert legal representation. The skilled attorneys of 1. 800.NOT.DRUNK
and www.NotDrunk.com will
provide a free consultation to outline an aggressive defense plan
designed to minimize or even eliminate the consequences of a New
Hampshire drunk driving arrest.

A New Hampshire DUI / DWI arrest
actually generates two separate cases – in criminal court, and at the
Division of Motor Vehicles. Both cases require expert legal
representation, but the DMV case is far more time-sensitive. A
motorist accused of drinking and driving must request an
administrative hearing within 30 days of arrest, or risk having his or
her driver’s license automatically suspended for six months.
The criminal case triggered by a New
Hampshire driving under the influence / driving while intoxicated
arrest can be charged in two different ways. The first is the
common-law drunk driving case, which alleges that the motorist was too
impaired to drive safely because he or she was under the influence of
alcohol, drugs, or a combination of the two.
The prosecutor will use evidence of
driving pattern, physical appearance, and field sobriety test
performance as circumstantial evidence to show impairment at the time
of driving. However, all of this evidence can be effectively
challenged by an experienced New Hampshire drunk driving lawyer.
A New Hampshire DUI / DWI case also
can be pursued as a violation of the state’s “per se" laws. This type
of drunk driving charge focuses only on whether the driver had a blood
alcohol content (BAC) of .08 percent or greater. This case is
typically proven through chemical test results. The results of
chemical tests can also be successfully challenged.
Unfortunately, drivers charged with a
first-offense DUI / DWI in New Hampshire don’t have the right to a
jury trial. Those charged with an aggravated first-offense drinking
and driving, or multiple-offense drunk driving, do have the right to a
jury trial.
The consequences of a drunk driving
conviction in New Hampshire have grown progressively harsher.
First-time DUI / DWI drivers don’t face jail time unless they have a
BAC of .16 percent or greater or other aggravating factors are
present. However, the driver faces a fine of $350 to $2,000 plus
penalty assessments, a license suspension of 90 days to two years, and
mandatory driving school.
First-time drunk drivers with a BAC of
.16 percent or greater, or other aggravating factors, face up to a
year in jail, a fine of $500 to $2,000 plus a 20 percent penalty
assessment, a license suspension of one to two years and a mandatory
seven-day in-patient treatment program. Motorists who drove more than
30 mph over the speed limit or who tried to evade the police also will
face aggravated DUI charges.
A motorist convicted of drunk driving
for a second time in New Hampshire faces three days to one year in
jail plus an in-patient seven-day treatment program. The driver also
must pay a fine of $500 to $2,000 plus penalty assessments and faces a
three-year license suspension.
Drivers convicted of a third DUI / DWI
in New Hampshire face up to one year in jail, a 30-day residential
treatment program, a fine of $500 to $2,000 plus a 20 percent penalty
assessment, and a seven-year driver’s license suspension. A fourth
drunk driving arrest will be charged as a felony punishable by up to
seven years in state prison.
Obviously, the stakes are high in a
New Hampshire DUI case, but it’s important to realize that drunk
driving cases can be fought and won with expert legal help. Anyone
arrested for drinking and driving should consult with a skilled New
Hampshire drunk driving defense lawyer from 1.800.NOT.DRUNK and
www.NotDrunk.com as quickly as
possible following an arrest for suspicion of DUI.
DISCLAIMER: No
representation is made that the quality of legal services to be
performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by
other lawyers.
|